Human medicine
The scientific case against animal experiments
Dr Robert Sharpe
Most people who oppose vivisection do so on moral grounds because they object to cruelty. But the case against animal experiments is strongly reinforced by scientific arguments. This is because people and animals are different in the way their bodies work and in their response to drugs and disease. more
Most people who oppose vivisection do so on moral grounds because they object to cruelty. But the case against animal experiments is strongly reinforced by scientific arguments. This is because people and animals are different in the way their bodies work and in their response to drugs and disease. more
Reliability of Animal Models in Assessing Human Health Issues
The scientific board of Pro Anima
The scientific board of Pro Anima has investigated in-depth the relevance of results from experiments based on the animal model, for the assessment of human health safety. more
The scientific board of Pro Anima has investigated in-depth the relevance of results from experiments based on the animal model, for the assessment of human health safety. more
The animal experiment within the human medicine
Dr. med. Werner Hartinger â€
Legitimacy, necessity and usability of animal experiments are justified by statements of people who achieve personal, professional, economical and political advantages by this »exploitation" of our fellow creatures. But as well as you do not agree with the opinion of a butcher about vegetarian diet, you should build your own, impartial opinion about this field of research. more
Legitimacy, necessity and usability of animal experiments are justified by statements of people who achieve personal, professional, economical and political advantages by this »exploitation" of our fellow creatures. But as well as you do not agree with the opinion of a butcher about vegetarian diet, you should build your own, impartial opinion about this field of research. more
The role of animal experimentation in the development of medicine
Dr Bernhard Rambeck
Up till the late 19th century the majority of doctors and healers, acting in accordance with the basic medical principle 'Nil nocere'- 'above all, do no harm,' hardly preoccupied themselves with the question whether knowledge useful for human therapy could be obtained from animals that had been made artificially sick or deliberately injured. more
Up till the late 19th century the majority of doctors and healers, acting in accordance with the basic medical principle 'Nil nocere'- 'above all, do no harm,' hardly preoccupied themselves with the question whether knowledge useful for human therapy could be obtained from animals that had been made artificially sick or deliberately injured. more
